Looking Through Unsearched Rolls of Wheat Cents

In the mid-1950s, when I was beginning to be in truth good about coin collect, I spent many an evening going through rolls of cents my forefather picked up at a depository financial institution or grocery store store on his way home from employment. These were all Wheaties, of run, and would be until 1959 when the Lincoln Memorial reverse was introduced. besides, the rolls were all unsearched, and they often contained pre-1940 cents. In fact, they sometimes had pre-1930 or even pre-1920 cents in them. As you would expect, the older coins were normally more wear than the late ones, but occasionally the rolls contained coins that had obviously not been circulating the solid time after they were minted. I particularly remember finding an About Uncirculated 1924-S Goiter Neck ( a Red Book variety show at the prison term ) in one of the rolls. My bespeak is that the rolls were great fun to go through because I never knew what would turn up. Although I haven ’ thyroxine looked through cent rolls from the bank in ages, I feel sanely convinced that I wouldn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate find much of interest in them. In fact, I suspect that evening Wheaties would be few and far between.

But what about the many listings for unsearched rolls of Wheat cents on eBay ? Would these rolls be like the ones I looked through in the 1950s ? As in the 1950s, could I expect to find a couple of G4 1914-Ds, a 1922 partial derivative D, two 1909-Ss, and rolls of such keepers as 1939-D, 1929-D, and many others, including all of the semi-key dates ? I found my answers to these questions in a holocene string I came across on CoinTalk. The title alone provided one answer : “ Deceitful eBay sellers-wheat pennies. ” The instigator ( OP ) of this train of thought was a new penis who apologized at the beginning for his drawn-out initiation. The bottom argumentation on his post was that he had bought three rolls of “ unsearched ” Wheaties from an eBay seller and figured the seller was making $ 10 profit on each roll. “ I bought them knowing they were craftily advertised and design to [ check ] a few more out with better documented proof. The 3 rolls I received had nothing but culls. ” therefore, the OP gave the seller a bad reappraisal, right ? amiss ! “ I besides gave them positive feedback because they somehow got my personal e-mail address and sent me a request to leave them incontrovertible feedback because their sales depend on it. I responded privately to them to let them know I wasn ’ thyroxine pleased but besides purchased knowing they were going to be duds. technically, I don ’ t have a claim for buyer ’ randomness compunction and everything else about the transaction went well. ” The OP concluded by asking if there ’ s anyone else interest in trying to get these dishonest sellers at least reprimanded for their behavior. In a by and by post, OP said that he had placed an order for three more rolls from an “ ender ” seller. This is the type of seller who puts an matter to coin at each end of a roll, interesting coins being items such as an indian Head cent, a 1909 VDB Lincoln, etc. When he receives the rolls, which he is “ optimistically pessimistic ” about, he plans to make a “ coin [ populace service announcement ] video recording about them.. .. ”

OP ’ s purpose in all this is that he has “. .. a burning desire to crush these people. If I lose a few bucks here and there to hopefully bring these suckers down, it will be worth it. ” In reply, one CT extremity wrote, “ Caveat Emptor, a $ 10 moral for beginning coin collectors. Some people have to take the test more than once to pass. then it ’ south on to altered coins, counterfeiting and artificial tone. ‘ An previous man has many scars. A fresh erstwhile homo treasures his scars. ’ ” Another member railed against the catchy pun in the ads. Based on many years of have, he cited terms such as “ original, ” “ found in a vault, ” and so forth. “ These have about disappeared and [ been ] replaced by “ Unsearched, ” which is where it becomes slippery calling them out. . .. The huge majority of those you reference are either dealers with a huge provide or an individual who buys them by the bag. They are then tubed without searching them. ” And are frankincense “ unsearched ” by the person who put them into rolls. Another extremity was critical of the positive feedback scores on eBay. “ I saw person who was selling [ baseball ] cards and had 100 percentage feedback from over 350,000 buyers. Is that mathematically possible ? ” He besides threw in some criticism of what OP was doing : “ Buying these things for whatever cause, knowing they are togs, is barely rewarding the crooks who pull this scam and it ’ s not going to save anyone else from being burned. ” A long-time collector noted : “ With television, social media, and eBay there is no room to protect newly collectors and investors whose general goal is to strike it rich. That ’ s where ‘. .. a gull and his money.. . ’ comes in. If they don ’ t have time to do some minimal research, then they need to learn the hard room. ” Another writer agreed with all the people who think there aren ’ t truly any unsearched rolls being sold by eBay sellers. Furthermore, even if there were sincerely unsearched Wheatie rolls, they would “. .. most often contain entirely coarse coins with no rarities, because that ’ s how ‘ park ’ and ‘ rarities ’ work. ” And I say “ amen ” to that, having looked through rightfully unsearched rolls in the 1950s and normally not finding anything worth keeping. As for leaving negative feedback on eBay, another CT extremity related the follow : “ The last roll I was taken on the seller refused to refund because I had opened them. [ Like how else are you going to look at them ? ] I left negative feedback and it was promptly somehow taken down. ”

so, what ’ s the verdict ? Do unsearched rolls exist ? Well, they may exist in some venues, but it ’ sulfur about surely not on eBay .

Related Posts

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.